Cllr with Sense of Responsibility Stands Head & Shoulders Above Colleagues

Yep, it has happened. After the crushing defeat inflicted by the Aspire Party on Thursday Labour’s Councillor Dan Tomlinson (Bromley North) has stood up and taken responsibility for the Low Traffic Networks project that contributed to the political drubbing.

Well, tried to take responsibility.

Not often we write ‘Labour councillor’ and ‘taken responsibility’ in the same sentence. In fact this may be a first.

Monday 16th August should have seen the Tower Hamlets Labour Group meeting take place as scheduled but without warning or explanation Labour members received an email on Friday cancelling it.

Cllr. Dan Tomlinson

Only over the weekend did the reason for the cancellation emerge, that Cllr Dan Tomlinson Cabinet Member for Environment and Public Realm and Liveable Streets / Low Traffic Networks Head Honcho, had intended to offer his resignation at the meeting.

He believed that the LTN nonsense was directly responsible for the Weavers defeat (true but not the whole story) and so he should step down. Moley is unsure if this meant he was stepping down as cabinet member or as a councillor or having anything to do with LTNs.

We have contacted Cllr Tomlinson for comment but at 6am on a Sunday that is asking a bit much.

It is not entirely clear that whoever runs Tower Hamlets Labour understands that cancelling a meeting where a councillor was intended to stand up and take responsibility for the LTN project does not solve the LTN issue itself.

EEE considers it is highly commendable that a councillor takes responsibility when things go pear-shaped.

If the councillor was responsible.

Whatever the merits of LTNs, trying to get a big project like this done in Tower Hamlets is virtually impossible and there is no way Cllr Dan should take this on himself ‘cos that just ain’t fair on him.

Nasrin Khan had chance zero of winning Weavers for Labour.

Nasrin Khan, Mayor Biggs & colleagues out canvassing in Weavers.

Parachuted in by Mayor Biggs, Weavers Labour members were very unhappy indeed.

This discord deepened when none other than Cllr Kevin Brady (St. Peters) took it upon himself to deliver a victory for Mayor Biggs, falsely claiming that he had persuaded the Lib Dems to vote for Labour (why would they do that?) and treating Weavers branch members with the level of contempt the ex-Chief Whip usually reserves for borough residents.

Cllr Brady was so intent on making sure his was THE LOUDEST VOICE IN THE ROOM he forgot to play nice.

Cllr Kevin Brady (St. Peters)

A Labour source claims that at one point Cllr Brady told a Weavers branch member to ‘piss off’.

Pretty mild by Tower Hamlets politics standards but just not the done thing in the circumstances.

Weavers branch members were so upset with Brady’s lack of people skills or organisational skills that they refused to campaign for Nasrin Khan, the official Labour candidate in their own ward.

This boycott was apparently repeated by other ward teams across the borough.

Usually it is all hands on deck for an election, not this time. Many Labour members stayed away in protest.

Cllr Brady ignored this. Mayor Biggs ignored this. LTN fangirl Cllr Rachel Blake ignored this.

These three should be taking responsibility for the Weavers defeat Dan, not you.

Ask yourself if either Mayor Biggs or Cllr Brady or Cllr Blake would ever offer to resign? Exactly.

Biggs or Brady won’t even take responsibility for the Weavers defeat for which they are directly responsible, let alone resign, so why should you?

Liveable Streets / Low Traffic Networks were a key factor in the Weavers defeat, the vote that Labour lost being distributed roughly 50/50 between Aspire and the Conservatives.

Sorry Lutfur, it was just a by-election! You aren’t in office yet.

Tweet of the Week

Why Low Traffic Networks are bound to fail

Here are a few of the reasons why Liveable Streets / Low Traffic Networks are bound to fail in our borough and why they may well lead to the final implosion of Tower Hamlets Labour Party.

  1. Narrow political support from the cycling brigade that is dominated by white male middle-class university educated rather-well-paid-now-thanks farties who think they have the right to dictate how others should live.
  2. Little political support from the vast majority of residents who do not own a bike, do not want a bike and are too damn busy trying to survive from week to week to think about anything else.
  3. LTN proponents taking the view that those against LTNs are also against reducing pollution, making neighbourhoods safer and stopping global warming and treating them as such.
  4. Failure of Labour Party to listen to residents.
  5. Residents having very little belief that the Liveable Streets consultations produced a valid result.
  6. Labour councillors such as Cllr Brady having no hesitation in lying to residents if it serves their cause and treating residents with contempt.
  7. Residents belief that LTNs are gentrification by stealth.
  8. As with other parts of London and the UK the LTN issues have been the direct cause of local communities uniting to fight them. Hundreds of new groups of political activists have sprung into being, rejecting any identification with Westminster politics. These groups will learn their trade fighting LTNs then move on to the next issue that threatens communities. They will not go away.
  9. Tower Hamlets Labour Party, like Tower Hamlets council, is dysfunctional and neither fit for purpose. Neither organisation is capable of delivering a project such as Liveable Streets with or without external consultants.
  10. Too many Labour councillors are elected members because it gives them enhanced status in their community, not because they want to serve.
  11. Other Labour party councillors remain elected members because elected office directly benefits their own commercial interests, be that a corner shop or providing enhanced access to council departments such as Planning.
  12. 10 and 11 leads to a small number of councillors close to the Executive Mayor who are only too keen to perpetuate his world view. Result? Weavers.

Does 12 remind you of anyone?

Please support the work of the East End Enquirer

If you found this story useful please consider helping the Wapping Mole and the East End Enquirer continue to cover issues like this by clicking the PayPal link below.

Donate via PayPal here.

As community journalists we do exactly what it says on our tin – we work for the community.

In Tower Hamlets, which covers most of London’s East End, that means we spend a lot of time investigating allegations of political corruption.

It is an unfortunate fact that the poorest local authority in the country is still beset by the highest levels of corruption.

As Love Wapping we were instrumental in exposing the electoral corruption of Mayor Lutfur Rahman.